LISTEN: CLICK TO LISTEN TO NEWSCAST
ARCHIVE: CLICK HERE
FACEBOOK: CVN FACEBOOK PAGE CLICK HERE
ALSO ON LINKEDIN AND GOOGLE+
1. SCOTLAND REFERENDUM ( 01:04 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 19SEP TheGuardian.com :
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 18SEP TheGuardian.com : Scottish referendum results in full.
CLICK TO VIEW VIDEO - Scotland First Minister Salmond concedes defeat.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 19SEP TheGuardian.com : Cameron pledges 'devolution revolution' after no vote.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 19SEP express.co.uk : Scottish referendum : Police investigate electoral fraud probe in Glasgow.
CLICK TO VIEW VIDEO - YouTube Video: Camera allegedly showing a British manager stuffing a ballot box in Scotland.
CLICK TO VIEW VIDEO - YouTube Video : Camera shows a table of "NO" ballots, but someone points out that there are ballots with "YES" marked, and included in the "NO" pile.
CLICK TO VIEW VIDEO - YouTube Video: Camera seems to show a woman placing a vote on one pile and then allegedly moving it to another pile.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 19SEP Martyn McLaughlin, TheScotsman.com : Electoral fraud allegations at Glasgow count.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 19SEP RT.com : Salmond resigns as first minister.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 19SEP RT.com : Spain, Italy, Belgium: Battle lines drawn for independence after Scottish vote.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 19SEP RT.com : Scotland votes 'no' to split from UK in independence referendum.
2. UKRAINE PRESIDENT 'DOG/PONY SHOW' IN NORTH AMERICA. ( 13:00 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 17SEP Laura Payton, CBC.ca : Petro Poroshenko urges additional loans, intelligence sharing with Canada.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 16SEP WN.com: European parliament ratifies EU-Ukraine association agreement.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 16SEP RT.com : Ukraine and EU ratify landmark Association Agreement.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 26AUG PraguePost.com : Ukraine/EU Association Agreement to be ratified in September.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - 01AUG Geoffrey West, CosmicVisionNews.com : The jurisdiction of 'peace'; the 3D defining of peace, and the 5D BE-ing of peace.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 18EP BBC.com Ukraine crisis: President Poroshenko in key US visit.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 18SEP Jim Dean, PressTV: Obama fails to portray Putin as 'aggressor' in Ukraine crisis.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 27JUL PressTV : NATO invades Ukraine, not Russia ; US columnist.
3. ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE TEAM REFUSE TO SERVE. ( 27:47 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 12SEP Gil Cohen, haaretz.com : Reservists from elite IDF intel unit refuse to serve over Palestinian 'persecution'.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 15SEP RT.com : Israeli military to discipline intel veterans over public refusal to spy on Palestinians.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 16SEP Ben White, MiddleEastMonitor.com : UN official confirms Israeli soldiers launched attacks from inside Gaza school.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 11SEP, HumanRightsWatch.org : Israel: In-depth look at Gaza school attacks.
4. SWEDEN ELECTION RESULT SWINGS TO CENTRE-RIGHT. ( 35:10 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 14SEP RT.com: Power shifts to left after Sweden parliamentary election.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - Homepage for the Swedish Election Office with a graph showing results.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 14SEP TheLocal.se : Social Democrats win Swedish election.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 14SEP RT.com : German euroskeptics surge in two more state parliaments.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - List of Bilderberg attendees 2013, listing specifically Stefan Löfven, the man who won the election in 2014.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - English homepage for the Government of Sweden.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - SEC.gov page : Explanation of the Central Index Key Number, or CIK#.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - Securities and Exchange Commission listing of foreign governments.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - Securities and Exchange Commission profile for the Kingdom of Sweden, CIK number: 0000225913
5. 'AUDIT THE FED' BILL PASSES US HOUSE. ( 44:03 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - CampaignForLiberty.org : 'Audit The Fed' passes House of Representatives.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 17SEP F. Peter Brown, WesternJournalism.com : What the House just did is a dream come true for Ron Paul and a nightmare for Harry Reid.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - clerk.House.gov page showing how each representative voted on the issue.
6. CHINA LAUNCHES GOLD EXCHANGE 11 DAYS EARLY. ( 45:59 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 16SEP Reuters.com : China selling gold contracts 11 days early.
7. LIBYA PARLIAMENT REMOVES GOVERNOR OF CENTRAL BANK. ( 47:55 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 14SEP af.Reuters.com : Libya's parliament dismisses central bank governor.
8. INDIA EMBARKS ON MASSIVE PROJECT FOR YOUTH AND ENVIRONMENT. ( 48:08 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 21JUL Sami Grover, mnn.com : To fight unemployment, India to plant two billion trees.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 27JUL Amada Froelich, TrueActivist.com : How India is creating 300,000 more jobs and planting two billion more trees.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 26JUL, Cherie Cheng, CounselHeal.com : Trees save lives and reduce respiratory problems.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - Environmental Paper: "Tree and forest effects on air quality and human Health in the US. ", by David J. Nowak, Satoshi Hirabayashi, Allison Bodine and Eric Greenfield.
9. SWEDISH CITY EXPERIMENTS WITH SIX-HOUR WORK DAYS. ( 54:23 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 10APR RT.com : More time for saunas? Sweden tries cutting working day to six hours.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 08APR TheLocal.se : Swedes to give six-hour workday a go.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - Homepage for the National Low Income Housing Coalition : Out of Reach 2014.
10. GERMAN SCIENTISTS PROVE LIFE AFTER DEATH. ( 60:06 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 29AUG WorldNewsDailyReport.com : German scientists prove there is life after death.
11. TECH: CAR IS 3D PRINTED IN CHICAGO. ( 63:25 MARK )
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 12SEP Julia Pyper, ClimateWire via ScientificAmerican.com : World's first 3D printed car made in Chicago.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 13SEP Brian Krassenstein, 3DPrint.com : Local Motors' 3D Printed 'Strati' Car Has Just Taken Its First Test Drive
12. SAYING 'NO' TO VACCINES: INDIA SUES GATES FOUNDATION AND NURSES QUITTING DUE TO DANGERS AND PRESSURES. ( 66:43 MARK )
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny offers a book "Saying No To Vaccines: A Resource Guide For All Ages". A number of basic facts about vaccinations are offered, and this list will be reproduced in the show summary for this story.
1. Vaccines are toxic.
Vaccines contain substances poisonous to humans (i.e. mercury, formaldehyde, aluminum, etc.) Vaccine package inserts contain this and other information required by law to be disclosed to the public. Although these inserts are produced for consumers, doctors do not make them available to their patients.
Vaccines are grown on and contain foreign tissue and altered genetic material of both human and animal origin.
2. Immunization (the act of injecting vaccines) depresses and disables brain and immune function. Honest, unbiased scientific investigation has shown vaccinations to be a causative factor in many illnesses including:
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (aka SIDS, crib or cot death)
Developmental disorders (autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, etc.)
Immune deficiency (i.e. AIDS, Epstein Barre Syndrome, etc.)
Degenerative disease (i.e. muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, cancer, leukemia, lupus, fibromyalgia, etc.)
3. The high rate of adverse vaccine reactions is being ignored and denied by conventional medicine.
Prior to 1990, doctors were not legally required to report adverse reactions to the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
Adverse reactions are considered "normal", are ignored or diagnosed as other diseases. Even with this poor system, reported damage is substantial.
Despite their current legal obligation, less than 10% of doctors report the damage they witness to the CDC.
Throughout history, many prominent medical and non-medical health professionals around the world have voiced their vehement opposition to vaccination calling it scientific fraud.
4. Mass Vaccination Programs systematically and recklessly endanger the public while disregarding our rights.
Since vaccination breaks the skin, it is technically a surgery. All surgeries by law require informed consent. Informed consent is rarely attained before vaccines are administered.
Doctors vaccinate the unwitting and uninformed. The vaccine manufacturers' package inserts which contain biased industry claims and the bare minimum required by law to reveal are not routinely made available to consumers so that they can make a more informed choice.
Double-talk and unethical enforcement such as threats, intimidation and coercion are used to ensure vaccination compliance.
5. There is no proof that vaccinations are safe or effective.
There are no control group studies. Authorities consider that "to not vaccinate" is unethical and have refused to study unvaccinated volunteers. If control studies were done according to honest science, vaccination would be outlawed.
Studies which have been done are not designed to eliminate the examiners bias. Authorities who compile and report disease statistics work closely with and have a vested interest in companies which produce the vaccines. In other industries, this kind of bias is not tolerated. Injuries and deaths in these studies are attributed to anything but vaccination to skew the results and make it appear that vaccines have some merit.
6. Laws allow drug companies to violate the public trust.
In private vaccine damage suits, information is revealed condemning vaccines as deadly.
Vaccine manufacturers use "gag orders" as a leverage tool in vaccine damage legal settlements to restrict the plaintiff from disclosing to the public the truth about the dangerous nature of vaccines. Our government has allowed these unethical tactics to be used which jeopardize public welfare.
7. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1987 is a pacifier.
This compensation program pretends to acknowledge the existence of vaccine damage by making "right" the wrongs done. Nothing in this Act attempts to avert these adverse events from happening in the future.
This Act is the result of vaccine producers pressuring the government to "immunize" them from private lawsuits which can run an average of $4 million per case.
The fund is made up of tax added into the cost to the consumer of each vaccine, thereby making vaccine consumers pay for one another's and perhaps their own injury; the vaccine manufacturers have made themselves quite "immune" from accountability. In recent years it has become even more difficult to be compensated through this program due to the parameters for determining vaccine damage changing and coroners now ruling out vaccine damage and charging the parents with Shaken Baby Syndrome.
8. Private insurance companies, which do the best liability studies, have totally abandoned coverage for damage to life and property due to:
Acts of God
Nuclear war and nuclear power plant accidents
9. Vaccination is not emergency medicine.
It is claimed that vaccines avert a possible future risk and yet people are pressured to decide on the spot. A doctor's use of fear and intimidation to force compliance is not ethical. Vaccines are drugs with potential serious adverse reactions. Time and forethought should be given before a decision is made.
10. There is no law enforcing vaccination for babies or anyone else.
Vaccination is linked with school attendance but is not compulsory. Exemptions from vaccinations, although restricted and monitored, are part of every state public health law and can be expanded by public pressure.
Departments of Health, Education and the American Medical Association personnel profit from the sale of vaccines. They keep the existence of and details about exemptions relatively unknown."
The list of the ten basic facts will be copied into the show summary related to this story, along with all relevant links for your own research.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 19SEP HealthImpactNews.com : Gates Foundation vaccine empire under fire in India.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 31AUG Narayana Kumar, TimesOfIndia.com : Controversial vaccine studies: Why is Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under fire from critics in India?
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - Undated, TropicalTraditions.com : YouTube Video: Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Saying NO to vaccines. Ten basic facts to know about vaccines.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 11SEP Dave Mihalovic, PreventDisease.com: One Third of Nurses Are Leaving Their Jobs and Losing Faith in Vaccines.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 05SEP Jonathan Benson, NaturalNews.com : Moms of autistic, vaccine-damaged children mount wave of online protest against CDC research fraud.
13. REQUEST TO SWEDISH CVN LISTENERS. ( 80:11 MARK )
I am in the process of looking around for work, and I would like to ask if anyone has any contacts with media companies that do voice-over work, or that could use me for projects that will allow me to earn some money to pay for an apartment and expenses?
If you happen to know anyone in this industry, or perhaps you may have some other ideas or contacts in Stockholm or in the Stockholm area that may be suitable for me to contribute to for a period of time, I would most graciously appreciate any assistance that people may be willing to offer to help me stay here in Sweden. Please contact me through the email: Info@CosmicVisionNews.com.
14. FINAL WORDS - SOME THOUGHTS ABOUT REFERENDA. ( 81:07 MARK )
And in this week's FINAL WORDS,
I'd like to explore this event that is called a referendum. Referendum is the term applied to a singular event, while referenda is the term applied to multiple events.
For example, Scotland is currently having a referendum on a question. The Province of Quebec in Canada has had two referenda over the years on the question of sovereignty.
A referendum may be a beneficial tool within a functioning democracy, and one that has not been hijacked by a commercial legal system, and a parliamentary system that has has hijacked by corporate and commercial interests.
A referendum is different from an election in the sense that an election involves electing individuals to represent the population in setting a direction for the country. A referendum is a vote, usually on a singular question of importance that is put to the people to help a government decide on a future course of action.
It is reasonably safe to say that all western governments, at the very least, are controlled if not directly, then with significant indirect influence, by an external group of entities, be they individuals, corporations or influential institutions. How can I make this claim? To my knowledge, there is no western leader who is standing up to defend the rights of the people and the planet against a criminally fraudulent system of commercial law, nor are they revealing the enslavement of their constituents to a criminal, fractional reserve-model of banking that hurts people to support commercial contracts, power and profit.
This does not suggest a true democracy in my personal opinion. There is a participatory democracy where the people are allowed to directly participate in the direction of a government elected by and for the people. Western people are predominantly under the illusion of being in a participatory democracy. A representative democracy involves more a body of governance that uses the vote of the people as their authority or justification to act on their behalf, often without any consultation of the people being involved.
Representative governments, for example, may not campaign on a platform to invade another country, or to send its young people to kill or be killed supporting a war that was created for profit and commercial gain. However, this government may use the mandate given to it by the electorate to initiate such acts, and then sell those same acts as 'protecting democracy' or the freedom of the people of the world.
As is now being discovered, the system of representative democracy has been usurped and given legality, through the rules of commercial law, using a language that the people do not understand, while creating rules that have been given the force of law and put into effect without the consent of the people.
Scotland, currently a part of the United Kingdom, a part of NATO, and also enslaved to the banking system and the system of commercial law, is seeking to become 'independent'. A lot of preparation goes into a referendum, and a lot of money is spent just to determine the question that people will be voting on.
Why is it necessary to spend so much money on determining the question to be voted on? Ultimately, it comes down to the competing commercial interests that are seeking to influence the outcome of the vote by wording the question in such a way so as to move people in a certain direction.
This is fundamentally a trick used in the practice of commercial law. In a true, participatory democracy, the outcome of a referendum would be honoured. According to duhaime.org, an online legal dictionary site, the following is stated about referenda:
"A referendum ... is basically a consultative process, a device for the gathering of opinions. Voting in a referendum differs significantly from voting in an election.
"First, unless it legislatively binds itself to do so, a government is under no obligation to consult its citizens through the mechanism of a referendum. It may ... bind itself to conduct a specific referendum but, in the absence of such legislation, there is no obligation to hold this type of consultation.
"Second, though a referendum may carry great political weight and a government may choose to act on the basis of the results obtained, such results are non-binding in the absence of legislation requiring a government to act on the basis of the results obtained. In the absence of binding legislation, the citizens of this country would not be entitled to a legal remedy in the event of non-compliance with the results.
If a government holds a referendum and then ignores the results, the remedy would be in the political and not the legal arena." This last part basically means that if a government ignores the outcome, then the people can vote the government out in the next election, which could be years into the future, giving that same government the time to continue on whatever agenda it has committed itself to, while ignoring those whom they were elected to represent. There would be no legal recourse, unless there was something written into that nations constitution.
I mentioned the Province of Quebec a few moments ago. They attempted to separate from Canada first in 1980 and then again in 1995. According to Wikipedia, the question posed to the people of the province was this:
" The Government of Quebec has made public its proposal to negotiate a new agreement with the rest of Canada, based on the equality of nations; this agreement would enable Quebec to acquire the exclusive power to make its laws, levy its taxes and establish relations abroad — in other words, sovereignty — and at the same time to maintain with Canada an economic association including a common currency; any change in political status resulting from these negotiations will only be implemented with popular approval through another referendum; on these terms, do you give the Government of Quebec the mandate to negotiate the proposed agreement between Quebec and Canada?"
The result was an approximate 60-40 decision to not give the Government of Quebec that mandate. The interpretation here being that the people did not want Quebec to separate from Canada.
The question for 1995 was:
"Do you agree that Quebec should become sovereign after having made a formal offer to Canada for a new economic and political partnership within the scope of the bill respecting the future of Quebec and of the agreement signed on June 12, 1995?"
In the fifteen years between referenda, the Government of Canada was able to further separate and upset the people of Quebec, which began a strong campaign to protect the French language and culture, especially within Quebec.
In the referendum of 1995, by what is perhaps the narrowest of margins, the people voted 50.6% no, and 49.2% yes, with about 54,000 votes out of approximately 4.7 million votes, with 86,500 blank or invalid votes registered. In a situation like this, this is where every vote counts.
In Scotland, the media and the polls seem to indicate that the vote is almost the same as in Quebec. The ScotReferendum.com website reports that the question being asked is:
" Should Scotland be an independent country?", with the answer being 'yes' or 'no'. The same website explains that the process that determined the question by writing that: " The independent Electoral Commission tested the Scottish Government's proposed question with members of the public to ensure that people will easily understand it. Tt suggested a minor amendment, which we accepted. This was then agreed by the Scottish Parliament."
The general population has its own idea of what 'independence' may mean. It is the system of commercial law, and those trying to profit or preserve power from this system or the banking system, that seek to introduce confusion. What does 'independence' truly mean? In a system of commercial law and fiat currency banking, a lot of doubt can thrown into a very simple question by getting people to focus on the fear of what 'independence' might mean, with all the conditions and perceived hardships that may apply in becoming independent.
The controlled media also mess with the minds of the people. I will include an example of this in the show summary with the written form of this commentary. The BBC offered a series of questions to be considered, designed to scare people into voting 'no'.
Depending upon the true courage of the leadership, and if they are willing to follow a similar path to Iceland for example, there may be some hardships in the short term, as the country reorganizes itself. There is always a period of transition, but the people in power try to play upon the human laziness to accept the status quo, and avoid any hardships for change. If the mindset can be turned into one working for progressive and inclusive change, while turning away from the current systems of enslavement, Scotland can grow, and become a global example, similar to Iceland - assuming the people understand how they have been enslaved and controlled.
A very simple question, but with very complicated consequences either way. Who is really guiding the outcome, the people, or those who control the processes by which the people think they are exercising a democratic right?
Until the ROOT source of the corruption is addressed, and this is where the people must truly go after their politicians and start holding them accountable, there is only the illusion of democracy. You can exercise a vote..but IF your vote is not an informed vote, it could be asked if that is really a vote? You can vote for one set of rules that will enslave you, or you can vote for another set of rules that will enslave you, while no one is questioned or held accountable to the crime of enslavement in the name of democracy.
I ask you: Does this make you free?
Create a wonderful week, until our next moment of 'now'!
EXTRA NOTE: The following appeared in a BBC news article, but this was not a part of the original audio commentary. This is an example of how the media can mess with the minds of the people in pushing for an outcome. The results seem to suggest that the people did not fall for the trick, and continued to support the idea of being independent.
"What is your preferred question for the independence referendum in 2014?
Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?
Do you agree that Alex Salmond should become King Eck and everyone in Scotland should be forced to speak Gaelic?
Do you want Scotland to become separated from our friends and family in the UK, as it plummets towards bankruptcy, leaving the population to subsist by eating grass?
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - Duhaime.org : Legal definition for 'referendum'.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - Wikipedia: Question asked for the Quebec referendum of 1980.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - Wikipedia: Question asked for the Quebec referendum of 1980.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - 16SEP BBC.com : Scotland politics.
CLICK TO VIEW ARTICLE - BBC.Scotlandshire.co.uk : What is your preferred question for the referendum?
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - ScotReferendum.com : How the referendum question was decided.
CLICK TO VIEW WEBPAGE - ScotReferendum.com : What question is being asked for the referendum.
Thank you for supporting Cosmic Vision News and A Greenprint For LIFE! Your Light, and your energies of support, financial and other, allow me to continue being in service to you, humanity, our planet and our benevolent galactic families, for the Highest Good of all!
To support via PayPal, please click 'Donate'
You can now donate Bitcoins!
- Marco Missinato (original score - 2012)
Marco Missinato's Sounds Of Oneness Tour: